I was in a discussion about the ways in which Jesus has been ethnically depicted across the world over the centuries. In movies, on TV, and in paintings, folks have chosen to make Jesus in their own image. One colleague stated that the well-known picture of a Caucasian Jesus that used to be found in the homes and on the church fans of African-American families across the US was created by someone from their denomination. European Jesus. Latino Jesus. Chinese Jesus, etc. In America, we see what I call Brad Pitt Jesus, a good-looking actor-type with long blonde hair and blue eyes. Somehow in the movies Jesus always has a British accent. ETHNOCENTRIC means evaluating other peoples cultures according to the standards of one's own culture; characterized by or based on the attitude that one's own group is superior. An argument was put forth that the Godhead made us all in their own image and likeness (Gen. 1:26), so everyone ought to have the right to illustrate Jesus in their own ethnicity. My first impulse was, NO! so I asked the question, "Why can't we all just be ok with the fact that Jesus was a Middle Eastern Jewish man?" Then we can use anthropology, biblical accounts, and technology to depict him as a Jewish man from the Middle East, including probable olive or darker skin. He wasn't Brad Pitt-like. Isaiah told us, "...He has no form or comeliness; And when we see Him, There is no beauty that we should desire Him." (Isa. 53:2b)
No comments:
Post a Comment